View copy for review. The canonical source is the omnione-canon repo — in canon this sits inside the ACT section as ### ACT Decision Doctrine (commit d62134a). "Critical vs Emergent Solutions" is a pointer in canon (home: Proposal Formation › Pre-proposal + Preferences vs. Solutions); shown here in full for your review.

Scope

This doctrine formalizes decision logic, cultural doctrine, and interpretive rules that are already present implicitly across OmniOne documents, but were not previously consolidated into a single interpretive reference.

This doctrine does not override Canon Law. It clarifies how Canon Law operates in practice.

Decision Quality Metrics

OmniOne evaluates decision systems using the following primary metrics:

1. Effectiveness — Does the decision move the system toward its agreed future?
2. Coherence — Do participants share the same understanding of what was decided and why?
3. Collective Intelligence Utilization — Were all relevant perspectives, expertise, and evidence surfaced?
4. Decision Elimination Rate — Percentage of decisions removed because solutions are already agreed. In OmniOne, ~99% of decisions never need resolution.
5. Stability Over Time — Likelihood the decision will remain valid without repeated renegotiation.
6. Dignity Preservation — No participant is overridden, coerced, or silenced.

Speed is a secondary metric and only meaningful when effectiveness and coherence are preserved.

Solutionary Culture Doctrine

OmniOne operates on pre-consent to solutions.

• Blocking is not permitted.
• Passive resistance is not permitted.
• If a participant cannot consent, they must propose an alternative solution.

This doctrine removes force while ensuring progress.